shell gas station sign
Photo: iStock.com/Sjo

GREAT BRITAIN — Shell Energy Retail Limited now has to refund 12,000 British customer accounts that were overcharged, plus pay Ofgem’s consumer redress fund for a total payout of £390,000, it was announced today.

Ofgem, an independent energy regulator for Great Britain, found that between January and March 2019 Shell Energy Retail overcharged electricity and gas customer accounts £100,736.63 collectively above the level of the price cap.

Shell Energy Retail, trading under First Utility at the time, has agreed to refund all customers by re-crediting their accounts and to pay additional compensation to all affected customers.

According to Ofgem, about 6,200 Shell customer accounts were on tariffs that were not compliant with the price cap, meaning they paid above the cap for gas and/or electricity. Shell Energy Retail has agreed to refund these customers and pay an additional £62,000 in compensation (£10 per fuel), Ofgem said.

The regulator added that another 5,600 customer accounts experienced a delay in energy price being reductions under the price cap. This means that even though they had requested to change to a less expensive plan, they paid above the cap level longer than necessary, Ofgem said. Shell Energy Retail has agreed to refund these customers and pay £29,000 in compensation (£5 per fuel), the regulator said.

According to Ofgem, Shell Energy Retail has agreed to pay an additional £200,000 into Ofgem’s voluntary redress fund “to help support vulnerable customers.”

The regulator added that it will not take formal enforcement actions due to Shell Energy’s refund efforts.

“Ofgem closely monitors all suppliers’ approach to the implementation of the cap and will continue to hold suppliers to account if they do not meet their obligations,” the regulator’s report said.

Sell Energy Retail CEO Apologizes

In a recent e-mail to Reuters, Shell Energy Retail Chief Executive Officer Colin Crooks said: “We’d like to apologize to all customers who were temporarily out of pocket,”.

Crooks reportedly went on to say that the company had a small number of customers on fixed-price default tariffs to whom it didn’t apply the capped rates since most of those customers would have been better off remaining on their existing tariff.

“However, we recognize that there were some who would have been better off on the capped rates or who suffered a delay in changing their payment method,” he added.

Author:
Energy Pages is an online trade publication and business directory for the retail energy industry. We publish editorials, resources, case studies, practical information and industry news. Our content is about and for industry leaders, innovators, investors and influencers.

Your Opinion Matters

Have Something To Say About This Story?

Sign Up for the Energy Pages Digest

Our weekly must-see brief

You May Also Like

Understanding NAESB and the FERC Version 3.1 Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NOPR)

As you may already be aware, FERC has proposed to adopt Version 3.1 of the NAESB Standards. Today we will provide an overview of the upcoming North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) Version 3.1 Standards which have been proposed for adoption by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Our organization has been involved with NAESB since its inception in 2002, and with the Gas Industry Standards Board (GISB), the precursor to NAESB, before that.

NEM: Choice Works in Connecticut and Nationally

Connecticut Consumer Counsel fails to consider important facts

Australian Power Producer Synergy Under Investigation for Alleged $100 Million Price Gouge

A regulatory body is investigating the company for price gouging industrial customers between March 2016 and July 2017

Japanese Retail Energy Market Presents Opportunities for U.S. Suppliers

Upcoming webinar looks at the country’s vibrant market and advantages for U.S. businesses