Cellphone unknown call

The world of robocalls–even in retail energy markets–will start looking very different very soon.

This Thursday, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted to give phone carriers the power to automatically block robocalls they deem illegal or that they feel are unwanted or unwarranted.

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai provided a statement explaining the reasoning behind the vote. He began the statement highlighting the response he received from average Americans after news broke three weeks ago the vote would take place.

Much of the input expressed a sense of relief, as if a burden was about to be lifted. This response, Pai said, was representative of a wide-reaching sentiment among all people, regardless of beliefs, creed or political stance.

“If there is one thing in our country right now that unites Republicans and Democrats, liberals and conservatives, socialists and libertarians, vegetarians and carnivores, Ohio State and Michigan fans, it is that they are sick and tired of being bombarded by unwanted robocalls,” he said.

Ruling May Affect Competitive Retail Energy Markets

Over the past three months, three different energy supply companies in retail markets faced class-action lawsuits for unwarranted robocalls.

The prevalence of these missteps led to the Pennsylvania Utilities Commission’s Dan Mumford to tell a crowd at a National Energy Marketers conference earlier this year that robocalls were “the hot button issue right now”.

In competitive markets, convincing customers to sign a contract is part of the business environment. However, consumers drew the line at unwanted robocalls pitching an ESCO’s services and/or pricing.

The new FCC regulations would allow mobile carriers to use their own discretion in blocking those robocalls. So, there could be a chance that an ESCO’s sending out robocalls pitching new programs or low pricing may never get through to the people they’re trying to contact.

In one sense, it will cut away one method of several through which ESCO’s search out new customers. In another sense, it may also cut down the chance that lawsuits will arise. Should a mobile carrier become zealous in blocking robocalls, an ESCO may inadvertently avoid litigation for calls that otherwise wouldn’t be blocked.

The FCC’s decision is indicative of a growing distaste for robocalls among citizens and lawmakers. Right now, Congress is mulling the Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence (TRACED) Act, which would further regulate how carriers handle robocalls.

Author:
Energy Pages is an online trade publication and business directory for the retail energy industry. We publish editorials, resources, case studies, practical information and industry news. Our content is about and for industry leaders, innovators, investors and influencers.

Your Opinion Matters

Have Something To Say About This Story?

Sign Up for the Energy Pages Digest

Our weekly must-see brief

You May Also Like

Understanding NAESB and the FERC Version 3.1 Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NOPR)

As you may already be aware, FERC has proposed to adopt Version 3.1 of the NAESB Standards. Today we will provide an overview of the upcoming North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) Version 3.1 Standards which have been proposed for adoption by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Our organization has been involved with NAESB since its inception in 2002, and with the Gas Industry Standards Board (GISB), the precursor to NAESB, before that.

Energy Brokers Support Broker Regulation in Texas

Industry insiders say proposed broker rules will create “more sound marketplace”, benefit consumers through accountability.

NEM: Choice Works in Connecticut and Nationally

Connecticut Consumer Counsel fails to consider important facts

Texas House Passes Energy Broker Bill, Has TEPA Support

TEPA director says group is “pleased with the final version” of SB 1497.