Downtown Houston, Texas
Downtown Houston, Texas

The Lone Star State’s energy brokers may have to answer to the Texas Public Utility Commission (PUC).

Sen. Judith Zaffirini submitted SB 1497 to the Senate Business and Commerce committee, who voted in favor of the bill 8-0 on Mar. 27, according to the state legislature’s records. The bill will now move to another phase of voting.

Proposed Bill Calls For Broker Accountability

According to a copy of the bill we viewed at the time of publishing, Zaffrini’s bill calls for the following six regulations and provisions:

  • All brokers conducting business in the state must register with the PUC
  • Retail electric providers aren’t allowed to knowingly give bids to an unregistered broker
  • The registered broker has to comply with “consumer protection provisions, disclosure requirements and marketing guidelines”
  • The PUC is responsible to create the rules to put the bill into action
  • The PUC must process applications in 60 days or less from the day the broker submits their application

The bill lays out basic principles for the broker registration process but does not detail nuances like the cost of applying, how long the application is good for and which types of punishments the PUC would administer should brokers or energy companies violate the regulations the PUC sets forth in the event the bill passes.

According to the bill, it would take effect on Sept. 1 of this year.

“We Are Supportive of the Bill”: TEPA

Huston Able, president of the national board of The Energy Professionals Association (TEPA) and executive vice president of Houston-based Choice Energy Services, told Energy Pages that TEPA supports the bill.

“We are supportive of the bill in regards to brokers being registered in the state of Texas, which provides an identifier for said brokers’ shops that are operating in our state,” Able told us in a phone interview

As far as the consumer is concerned, Able said a bill like this protects them from disreputable brokers who appear one day and vanish the next.

“This creates a more sound marketplace for the customer, whereas at the end of the day, the customer is getting the best products and services from reputable brokers that have been operating correctly,” he said

Regulations Will “Protect Customers”

Jim Mathers, president of Florida-based Energy Professionals, has more than 20 years of experience in deregulated energy markets including Texas.

He said in a statement to Energy Pages that proper energy-broker regulations protect Texas’ ratepayers.

“I think broker regulation will protect customers from entities that take advantage of customers through ignorance or neglect. Also, I believe this will protect brokers who are delivering an honest service from entities who disregard common contract law,”Mathers said.

Creating the right set of regulations, however, is the trick. The states who do it right, he said, are those that make sure brokers are solvent, understand deregulation rules, educate customers about price comparisons and what goes into pricing, as well as understand contract law.

At this point, the proposed bill contains a lot of unknowns and gives a lot of leeway to the PUC to adopt all the necessary rules to implement the regulations. Mathers said a possible mistake is that the PUC could treat brokers nearly the same way as energy suppliers.

“Some states…add complexity to broker license applications that brokers have no knowledge or responsibility over, such as wholesale energy purchasing, and billing requirements,” Mathers said. “Brokers should facilitate transactions between the customer and the supplier, and should be making the customer aware of the pros and cons of each of the suppliers that they represent to the customer.”

Author:
Energy Pages is an online trade publication and business directory for the retail energy industry. We publish editorials, resources, case studies, practical information and industry news. Our content is about and for industry leaders, innovators, investors and influencers.

Your Opinion Matters

Have Something To Say About This Story?

Sign Up for the Energy Pages Digest

Our weekly must-see brief

You May Also Like

Understanding NAESB and the FERC Version 3.1 Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NOPR)

As you may already be aware, FERC has proposed to adopt Version 3.1 of the NAESB Standards. Today we will provide an overview of the upcoming North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) Version 3.1 Standards which have been proposed for adoption by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Our organization has been involved with NAESB since its inception in 2002, and with the Gas Industry Standards Board (GISB), the precursor to NAESB, before that.

NEM: Choice Works in Connecticut and Nationally

Connecticut Consumer Counsel fails to consider important facts

Texas House Passes Energy Broker Bill, Has TEPA Support

TEPA director says group is “pleased with the final version” of SB 1497.

Arizona Commission Opens Study of Retail Electric Market Opening

On December 3, in one of the first substantive moves to address energy competition in Arizona, the Arizona Corporation Commission held a special open meeting. The purpose of the three-hour meeting was to discuss in detail the possibility and ramifications of opening Arizona up to competitive retail energy and/or natural gas.